When Paul refers to every one of you who judges,
he addresses
mainly Jews; or
both Jews and Gentiles.
Most likely, Paul refers has in mind the Jews in Rome. Of course, the Gentiles are not excluded from Paul’s teaching, but he seems to give special attention to the Jews. We can detect this for two reasons. First, Paul hints at the fact that his audience in this section is the Jews. We can deduce this most obviously when we reach Romans 2:17 where Paul explicitly addresses the Jews in Rome.
Further, there is a symmetry to Paul’s argument that all are condemned in that, in Romans 1:18–32 he seems to have the Gentiles in mind, while in Romans 2:1–29 he targets the Jews. We can infer that Romans 1:18–32 is aimed at the Gentiles because Paul says all know God from what he made, while the Jews also know God through special revelation. Further, he condemns what Jews would identify as specifically Gentile sins such as idolatry and homosexuality, before introducing broader categories. Paul is asking the Gentile audience to recognize their sin and setting up the Jewish audience to condemn them. Then, in Romans 2:1, Paul says that every one of you who judges
are likewise condemned, for you partake in the same sins. In other words, not only are the Gentile sinners condemned, but so are the Jews who judge them.
Some think that Paul addresses both Jews and Gentiles in Romans 2:1. These contend that when Paul says that every one of you who judges
is condemned, Paul uses the adjective all
with the one who judges,
which suggests that Paul has in mind everyone whatsoever who judges. Further, Paul would have known both self-righteous Gentiles and Jews, so his teaching applies to both.
While it is true that his teaching applies to both Gentiles and Jews, and that he no doubt knew self-righteous people in both camps, the structure of this section suggests he primarily has Jews in mind. In Romans 1:18–32 he describes those who know God but fail to recognize him with the third-person plural they.
Then in Romans 2:1 he switches to the second-person singular you,
indicating a possible shift in audience. Further, it would be far more likely for Gentiles to approve of sinful behaviour than to judge others while partaking in it themselves. The tendency for Jews was to judge others.
Thus, while Paul’s teaching applies to both Gentiles and Jews, his primary target in Romans 2:1 seems to be the Jews in Rome.
Interpretation 1:
Paul mainly addresses the Jews.
Summary:
Paul has explained that all people, including the Gentiles, know they ought to praise and thank God, and yet they fail to do so. Now Paul shifts his attention to the Jews who join Paul in condemning those who live wicked lives. For not only are the wicked Gentiles condemned, but so are the Jews who judge others, for they practice the same wickedness.
Advocates:
James Dunn
Craig Keener
Douglas Moo
Leon Morris
Thomas Schreiner
Frank Thielman
Minor differences:
Our authors agree that Paul addresses both Jews and Gentiles throughout Romans, but that in Romans 2:1 he shifts his attention to the Jews.
Craig Keener suggests that Paul addresses the moral laxity of the Gentiles in Romans 1:32, for they know they deserve death for disobeying God, and yet they continue in wickedness and even condone it. Now in Romans 2:1, Paul focuses on the Jews, who, rather than condoning wicked behaviour, judge those who participate in it while participating in it themselves. So both Gentiles and Jews disobey God. The difference for Keener is that the Gentiles do not care, while the Jews will not admit it.1
For Douglas Moo, on the other hand, while Paul is focused on the Jew, he also has in mind the self-righteous Gentile.2 That is to say, there were Gentiles who professed to follow the philosophers who condemned wicked behaviour, but who practiced it themselves. According to Moo, these do not fall outside the scope of whom Paul addresses in Romans 2:1, but his main target is the Jews.
Arguments
Possible weaknesses
Interpretation 2:
Paul addresses both Jews and Gentiles.
Summary:
Paul explains that not only those who practice wickedness are without excuse but those who judge those who practice wickedness are equally condemned. That is because those who judge those who practice wickedness, participate in the same wicked behaviour, so they are without excuse. In other words, neither the wicked nor the self-righteous, are justified before God.
Advocates:
Richard Longenecker
John MacArthur
Minor differences:
Our authors agree that Paul targets anyone who is self-righteous, whether Jew or Gentile.
There is a subtle difference between these. For Richard Longenecker, Paul addresses the Gentile who professed to follow the enlightened teachings of the philosophers, but who practiced well-known vices.10 Likewise, he has in mind the Jew who felt himself to be morally superior to the Gentile.11 John MacArthur adds a third group to list, namely, Christians who think they are exempt from God’s judgment because they do not act like the pagans.12
Arguments
Possible weaknesses
1 Therefore you have no excuse, O man, every one of you who judges. For in passing judgment on another you condemn yourself, because you, the judge, practice the very same things.